From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Sutton v. Williams

Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan
Mar 8, 2016
SC: 152315 (Mich. Mar. 8, 2016)

Opinion

SC: 152315

03-08-2016

MARY SUTTON, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. SHANNON ROSE WILLIAMS, NICHOLE MARIE WILLIAMS, a/k/a NICHOLE MARIE GARRETT, and RPM AUTO SALES, INC., Defendants-Appellees, and FARM BUREAU MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY OF MICHIGAN, Defendant-Appellant.


Order

Robert P. Young, Jr., Chief Justice Stephen J. Markman Brian K. Zahra Bridget M. McCormack David F. Viviano Richard H. Bernstein Joan L. Larsen, Justices COA: 320090
Oakland CC: 2013-131886-NI

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the June 18, 2015 judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the question presented should now be reviewed by this Court.

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

March 8, 2016

/s/_________

Clerk


Summaries of

Sutton v. Williams

Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan
Mar 8, 2016
SC: 152315 (Mich. Mar. 8, 2016)
Case details for

Sutton v. Williams

Case Details

Full title:MARY SUTTON, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. SHANNON ROSE WILLIAMS, NICHOLE MARIE…

Court:Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan

Date published: Mar 8, 2016

Citations

SC: 152315 (Mich. Mar. 8, 2016)