Sutton v. State

Full title: Melvin SUTTON, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Date published: Mar 23, 2022

338 So. 3d 347 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2022)

Opinion

No. 3D20-1497

03-23-2022

Melvin SUTTON, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Whidden Johnson, P.L., and Wade M. Whidden and Karen A. Johnson (Tampa), for appellant. Ashley Moody, Attorney General, and Gabrielle Raemy Charest-Turken, Assistant Attorney General, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Whidden Johnson, P.L., and Wade M. Whidden and Karen A. Johnson (Tampa), for appellant.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, and Gabrielle Raemy Charest-Turken, Assistant Attorney General, for appellee.

Before MILLER, GORDO and BOKOR, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. Abbott v. State, 958 So. 2d 1140, 1142 (Fla. 4th DCA 2007) ("[T]he determination of whether fundamental error occurred in such cases requires that the instructions be examined in the context of the other jury instructions, the attorneys' arguments, and the evidence in the case.") (citations omitted).