From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Sutton v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District
Jun 18, 1980
384 So. 2d 955 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1980)

Opinion

No. 80-474.

June 18, 1980.

Appeal from the Circuit Court, Pasco County, Ray E. Ulmer, Jr., J.


Appellant challenges the circuit court's summary denial of his motion to vacate three misdemeanor convictions and an adjudication of delinquency. In each claim, appellant alleged that he was denied the right to counsel.

We first consider the claims arising from the misdemeanor convictions. Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850 requires the defendant to seek relief from "the court which entered the judgment or imposed the sentence." Appellant was convicted of the misdemeanors in county court. Consequently, the circuit court had no jurisdiction to review the legality of those convictions.

It was the circuit court which adjudicated appellant to be a delinquent; so that court did have jurisdiction over appellant's motion with respect to the delinquency proceedings. Moreover, indigent juveniles are entitled to have counsel provided to them during such proceedings. In re Gault, 387 U.S. 1, 87 S.Ct. 1428, 18 L.Ed.2d 527 (1967). Nevertheless, to sustain a claim for denial of counsel, appellant had to allege that he was indigent at the time he appeared before the juvenile court. Savage v. State, 156 So.2d 566 (Fla. 1st DCA 1963). This he did not do. Therefore, his motion did not state grounds for relief.

AFFIRMED.

HOBSON and OTT, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Sutton v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District
Jun 18, 1980
384 So. 2d 955 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1980)
Case details for

Sutton v. State

Case Details

Full title:HOLLIS E. SUTTON, APPELLANT, v. STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District

Date published: Jun 18, 1980

Citations

384 So. 2d 955 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1980)

Citing Cases

Dilallo v. State

Thus, the circuit court lacked jurisdiction to entertain the 3.850 motion filed. See Breen v. State, 801…

Breen v. State

We reverse, as the circuit court lacked jurisdiction to rule on Breen's motion. Sutton v. State, 384 So.2d…