From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Sutton v. Shasta Indus.

United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit
Mar 11, 2022
No. 2021-2314 (Fed. Cir. Mar. 11, 2022)

Opinion

2021-2314

03-11-2022

SAM SUTTON Plaintiff-Appellant v. SHASTA INDUSTRIES INCORPORATED, Defendant-Appellee

Samuel J. Sutton, Jr., Phoenix, AZ, pro se. Timothy Berg, Fennemore Craig, P.C., Phoenix, AZ, for defendant-appellee. Also represented by Brett C. Gilmore, LYNDSEY MAASCH.


This disposition is nonprecedential.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Arizona in No. 2:20-cv-02320-SMB, Judge Susan M. Brnovich.

Samuel J. Sutton, Jr., Phoenix, AZ, pro se.

Timothy Berg, Fennemore Craig, P.C., Phoenix, AZ, for defendant-appellee. Also represented by Brett C. Gilmore, LYNDSEY MAASCH.

JUDGMENT

This Cause having been heard and considered, it is

Ordered and Adjudged:

Per Curiam

(Reyna, Mayer, and Cunningham, Circuit Judges).

AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.


Summaries of

Sutton v. Shasta Indus.

United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit
Mar 11, 2022
No. 2021-2314 (Fed. Cir. Mar. 11, 2022)
Case details for

Sutton v. Shasta Indus.

Case Details

Full title:SAM SUTTON Plaintiff-Appellant v. SHASTA INDUSTRIES INCORPORATED…

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit

Date published: Mar 11, 2022

Citations

No. 2021-2314 (Fed. Cir. Mar. 11, 2022)