From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

SUTTON v. PERB

Oregon Court of Appeals
Oct 15, 1985
702 P.2d 1171 (Or. Ct. App. 1985)

Opinion

D-607, D-711 S-38383; CA A30434

Argued and submitted March 18, 1985

Affirmed July 31, 1985 Reconsideration denied September 13, 1985 Petition for review denied October 15, 1985

Judicial Review from Public Employes' Retirement Board.

Gary K. Jensen, Eugene, argued the cause and filed the brief for petitioners.

Philip Schradle, Assistant Attorney General, Salem, argued the cause for respondent. With him on the brief were Dave Frohnmayer, Attorney General, and James E. Mountain, Jr., Solicitor General, Salem.

Before Richardson, Presiding Judge, and Warden and Newman, Judges.


PER CURIAM

Affirmed.


Petitioners seek judicial review of the Public Employes' Retirement Board's order on reconsideration, which cancelled their disability retirement allowances. ORS 237.195(1).

Petitioners argue at length about the meaning of the disability retirement allowance statutes, ORS 237.171 et seq. However, under the express findings PERB made, the cancellation of petitioners' allowances is required by the statutes even as petitioners argue they should be interpreted. They do not challenge the findings.

Affirmed.


Summaries of

SUTTON v. PERB

Oregon Court of Appeals
Oct 15, 1985
702 P.2d 1171 (Or. Ct. App. 1985)
Case details for

SUTTON v. PERB

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of the Denial of Disability Retirement Allowances of SUTTON…

Court:Oregon Court of Appeals

Date published: Oct 15, 1985

Citations

702 P.2d 1171 (Or. Ct. App. 1985)
702 P.2d 1171