From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Sutton v. Court of Common Pleas of Phila. Cnty.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania.
Nov 9, 2012
55 A.3d 1055 (Pa. 2012)

Opinion

No. 151 EM 2012.

2012-11-9

Olaf SUTTON, Petitioner v. The COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF PHILADELPHIA COUNTY, Respondent.


ORDER


PER CURIAM.

AND NOW, this 9th day of November, 2012, the Application for Leave to File Original Process, the Petition for Writ of Mandamus and/or Extraordinary Relief, the Application for an Immediate Hearing, the Application for Stay, and the Application for Appointment of Counsel are DISMISSED. See Commonwealth v. Reid, 537 Pa. 167, 642 A.2d 453 (1994) (hybrid representation not permitted). The Prothonotary is directed to forward the filings to counsel of record.


Summaries of

Sutton v. Court of Common Pleas of Phila. Cnty.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania.
Nov 9, 2012
55 A.3d 1055 (Pa. 2012)
Case details for

Sutton v. Court of Common Pleas of Phila. Cnty.

Case Details

Full title:Olaf SUTTON, Petitioner v. The COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF PHILADELPHIA…

Court:Supreme Court of Pennsylvania.

Date published: Nov 9, 2012

Citations

55 A.3d 1055 (Pa. 2012)