From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Sutton v. Carolei

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Nov 6, 1997
244 A.D.2d 156 (N.Y. App. Div. 1997)

Opinion

November 6, 1997

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Bronx County (Howard Silver, J.).


In this action arising from injuries plaintiff sustained when her car became disabled on a highway and was struck from behind, issues of fact exist that preclude the granting of summary judgment in favor of defendant-appellant JN Service Station. Such issues include whether negligent repairs to plaintiff's vehicle caused the breakdown so as to create the hazard of a collision with another vehicle, and, if so, whether such negligence was a proximate cause of plaintiff's injuries (see, Betancourt v. Manhattan Ford Lincoln Mercury, 195 A.D.2d 246, appeal dismissed 84 N.Y.2d 932; Derdiarian v. Felix Contr. Corp., 51 N.Y.2d 308).

Concur — Nardelli, J. P., Mazzarelli, Andrias and Colabella, JJ.


Summaries of

Sutton v. Carolei

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Nov 6, 1997
244 A.D.2d 156 (N.Y. App. Div. 1997)
Case details for

Sutton v. Carolei

Case Details

Full title:LINDA SUTTON, Respondent, v. SANDRINO CAROLEI, Respondent, and JN SERVICE…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Nov 6, 1997

Citations

244 A.D.2d 156 (N.Y. App. Div. 1997)
665 N.Y.S.2d 259

Citing Cases

Shutt v. Schwartz

The exact nature of the accident need not be foreseeable ( Derdiarian v. Felix Constr Corp, 51 NY2d 308,…

Shutt v. Schwartz

Additionally, it cannot be said, as a matter of law, that an accident was not foreseeable, if the electrical…