From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Sutton v. Brooks

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Apr 3, 2015
Case No. CV 14-589-ODW (KK) (C.D. Cal. Apr. 3, 2015)

Opinion

Case No. CV 14-589-ODW (KK)

04-03-2015

HAROLD KENT SUTTON, Plaintiff, v. DR. BROOKS, et al., Defendants.


ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636, the Court has reviewed the Complaint, the relevant records on file, and both the original and Final Report and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge. Plaintiff did not timely file objections to the original Report and Recommendation, which is substantively identical to the Final Report and Recommendation. The Court accepts the findings and recommendation of the Magistrate Judge.

IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that Judgment be entered dismissing this action with prejudice. DATED: April 3, 2015

/s/_________

HONORABLE OTIS D. WRIGHT, II

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

Sutton v. Brooks

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Apr 3, 2015
Case No. CV 14-589-ODW (KK) (C.D. Cal. Apr. 3, 2015)
Case details for

Sutton v. Brooks

Case Details

Full title:HAROLD KENT SUTTON, Plaintiff, v. DR. BROOKS, et al., Defendants.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Apr 3, 2015

Citations

Case No. CV 14-589-ODW (KK) (C.D. Cal. Apr. 3, 2015)