From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Sutton v. Bradley

United States District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania
Jan 26, 2009
CIVIL ACTION NO. 1:07-CV-1798 (M.D. Pa. Jan. 26, 2009)

Opinion

CIVIL ACTION NO. 1:07-CV-1798.

January 26, 2009


ORDER


AND NOW, this 26th day of January, 2009, upon consideration of the report of the magistrate judge (Doc. 58), recommending that defendants' motion for summary judgment (Doc. 29) be granted, and, following an independent review of the record, it appearing that plaintiff has not exhausted available administrative remedies as to all claims, and that such exhaustion is a necessary prerequisite to the filing of a complaint in federal court, see 42 U.S.C. § 1997e(a) ("No action shall be brought with respect to prison conditions . . . by a prisoner confined in any jail, prison, or other correctional facility until such administrative remedies as are available are exhausted."); see also Porter v. Nussle, 534 U.S. 516, 523-26 (2002), it is hereby ORDERED that:

The motion sought dismissal of the complaint, but was accompanied by affidavits and exhibits outside of the pleadings. The magistrate judge notified all parties that the motion would be considered under Rule 56 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and instructed plaintiff to respond to the motion as one for summary judgment. See (Docs. 34, 44); FED. R. CIV. P. 12(d) ("If, on a motion . . . to dismiss for failure of the pleading to state a claim upon which relief can be granted, matters outside the pleading are presented to and not excluded by the court, the motion shall be treated as one for summary judgment and disposed of as provided in Rule 56, and all parties shall be given reasonable opportunity to present all material made pertinent to such a motion by Rule 56."). Plaintiff filed a brief in opposition to the motion and accompanying exhibits on September 22, 2008. (See Doc. 54.)

1. The report (Doc. 58) of the magistrate judge is ADOPTED.
2. Defendants' motion for summary judgment (Doc. 29) is GRANTED.
3. The Clerk of Court is instructed to enter JUDGMENT in favor of defendants and against plaintiff for failure to exhaust administrative remedies.
4. Defendant's motion for suspension of the court's amended case management order (Doc. 56) is DENIED as moot.
5. Any appeal from this order is deemed frivolous and not in good faith. See 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3).
6. The Clerk of Court is instructed to CLOSE this matter.


Summaries of

Sutton v. Bradley

United States District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania
Jan 26, 2009
CIVIL ACTION NO. 1:07-CV-1798 (M.D. Pa. Jan. 26, 2009)
Case details for

Sutton v. Bradley

Case Details

Full title:EUGENE SUTTON, Plaintiff v. CAPTAIN E. BRADLEY, et al., Defendants

Court:United States District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania

Date published: Jan 26, 2009

Citations

CIVIL ACTION NO. 1:07-CV-1798 (M.D. Pa. Jan. 26, 2009)