From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Sutterfield v. Hogue

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS ABILENE DIVISION
Aug 4, 2020
CIVIL ACTION NO. 1:18-CV-206-C (N.D. Tex. Aug. 4, 2020)

Opinion

CIVIL ACTION NO. 1:18-CV-206-C

08-04-2020

CASEY BRENT SUTTERFIELD, Institutional ID No. 81218, Plaintiff, v. BRADY HOGUE, et al., Defendants.


ORDER ACCEPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

The United States Magistrate Judge made findings, conclusions, and a recommendation in this case. No objections were filed. The District Court made an independent examination of the record in this case and reviewed the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation for plain error. Finding none, the Court ACCEPTS and ADOPTS the Findings, Conclusions, and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate.

IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that Plaintiff's complaint and all claims alleged therein are DISMISSED without prejudice for want of prosecution pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b).

All relief not expressly granted and any pending motions are denied.

Judgment shall be entered accordingly.

SO ORDERED.

Dated August 4, 2020.

/s/_________

SAM R. CUMMINGS

SENIOR UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

Sutterfield v. Hogue

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS ABILENE DIVISION
Aug 4, 2020
CIVIL ACTION NO. 1:18-CV-206-C (N.D. Tex. Aug. 4, 2020)
Case details for

Sutterfield v. Hogue

Case Details

Full title:CASEY BRENT SUTTERFIELD, Institutional ID No. 81218, Plaintiff, v. BRADY…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS ABILENE DIVISION

Date published: Aug 4, 2020

Citations

CIVIL ACTION NO. 1:18-CV-206-C (N.D. Tex. Aug. 4, 2020)