From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Sutmaier v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District
Aug 16, 1989
550 So. 2d 42 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1989)

Opinion

No. 89-01988.

August 16, 1989.

Appeal pursuant to Fla.R.App.P. 9.140(g) from the Circuit Court for Hillsborough County; Edward H. Ward, Judge.


Nick Sutmaier timely appeals the summary denial of his motion for postconviction relief filed pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850. After finding that the records and files refuted the appellant's allegations, the trial judge denied the motion without an evidentiary hearing. However, the judge failed to attach to his order the pertinent portions of the records or files pursuant to rule 3.850(f).

Accordingly, we reverse the trial court's denial of the appellant's motion and remand the case to the trial court. On remand, should the judge again determine that the appellant is not entitled to relief, he shall attach to his order a copy of the files and records which conclusively show that the appellant is not entitled to relief. The appellant shall have thirty days subsequent to the entry of the new order to again seek appellate review.

SCHEB, A.C.J., and SCHOONOVER and FRANK, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Sutmaier v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District
Aug 16, 1989
550 So. 2d 42 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1989)
Case details for

Sutmaier v. State

Case Details

Full title:NICK J. SUTMAIER, APPELLANT, v. STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District

Date published: Aug 16, 1989

Citations

550 So. 2d 42 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1989)

Citing Cases

Sutmaier v. State

PER CURIAM. Nick Sutmaier timely appeals the summary denial of his postconviction relief motion filed…