Sutherland v. State

Full title: FRED DOUGLAS SUTHERLAND, Appellant v. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

Court: Court of Appeals of Texas, Second District, Fort Worth

Date published: Jan 30, 2003

No. 02-02-341-CV (Tex. App. Jan. 30, 2003)

Opinion

No. 02-02-341-CV.

Delivered January 30, 2003.

Appeal from the 90th District Court of Young County.

Fred Douglas Sutherland, Pro Se, for appellant.

Stephen E. Bristow, Dist. Atty. Graham, for appellee.

PANEL D: CAYCE, C.J.; DAY and LIVINGSTON, JJ.

MEMORANDUM OPINION ¹ AND JUDGMENT

1 See Tex.R.App.P. 47.4.

PER CURIAM.

On December 13, 2002, we notified appellant that his brief had not been filed as required by TEX. R. APP. P. 38.6(a). We stated we would dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution unless appellant or any party desiring to continue this appeal filed with the court within ten days a response showing grounds for continuing the appeal. We have not received any response.

Because appellant's brief has not been filed, we dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution. See TEX. R. APP. P. 38.8(a), 42.3(b).