From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Sutherland v. City of New York

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Nov 12, 1985
66 N.Y.2d 800 (N.Y. 1985)

Opinion

Argued October 10, 1985

Decided November 12, 1985

Appeal from the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the First Judicial Department, Ira Gammerman, J.

Howard R. Cohen for the City of New York and others, appellants.

David Henry Sculnick and Marian E. Silber for Presbyterian Hospital in the City of New York, sued herein as Columbia Presbyterian Hospital, and another, appellants.

Kathleen Gill Miller, Harry H. Lipsig and Pamela Anagnos Liapakis for respondents.


Order affirmed, with costs, and question certified answered in the affirmative. We interpret the question certified as asking whether the Appellate Division had the power to reinstate the natural parent as guardian ad litem. We conclude that it had that power, and pass on no other issue (Herrick v Second Cuthouse, 64 N.Y.2d 692; Brady v Ottaway Newspapers, 63 N.Y.2d 1031).

Concur: Chief Judge WACHTLER and Judges JASEN, KAYE, ALEXANDER and TITONE. Taking no part: Judges MEYER and SIMONS.


Summaries of

Sutherland v. City of New York

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Nov 12, 1985
66 N.Y.2d 800 (N.Y. 1985)
Case details for

Sutherland v. City of New York

Case Details

Full title:MAUDE SUTHERLAND, an Infant, by her Mother and Natural Guardian, HESTER…

Court:Court of Appeals of the State of New York

Date published: Nov 12, 1985

Citations

66 N.Y.2d 800 (N.Y. 1985)
497 N.Y.S.2d 906
488 N.E.2d 837

Citing Cases

Sutherland v. Milstein [2d Dept 1999

To the extent that the present action is alleged on behalf of plaintiff Hester Sutherland, it is time-barred…

Sutherland v. Milstein

To the extent that the present action is alleged on behalf of plaintiff Hester Sutherland, it is time-barred…