From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Sutherby v. City of Southgate

United States District Court, E.D. Michigan, Southern Division
Feb 22, 2024
No. 23-13112 (E.D. Mich. Feb. 22, 2024)

Opinion

23-13112

02-22-2024

KEVIN CHARLES SUTHERBY and SHERI M. FRICKE BAKER, Plaintiffs, v. CITY OF SOUTHGATE, LAURA WINEGARDEN, MATT VITITOE, JONATHAN B.D. SIMON, JAMES WASKE, BEN GONEK, and MDOC, Defendants.


David R. Grand, Magistrate Judge.

ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION AND DISMISSING THE COMPLAINT WITH PREJUDICE

DAVID M. LAWSON UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE.

Presently before the Court is the report issued on January 25, 2024 by Magistrate Judge David R. Grand pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b) recommending that the Court dismiss the complaint on its own motion for failure to plead any viable claim for relief. The deadline for filing objections to the report has passed, and no objections have been filed. The parties' failure to file objections to the report and recommendation waives any further right to appeal. Smith v. Detroit Fed'n of Teachers Local 231, 829 F.2d 1370, 1373 (6th Cir. 1987). Likewise, the failure to object to the magistrate judge's report releases the Court from its duty to independently review the matter. Thomas v. Arn, 474 U.S. 140, 149 (1985). However, the Court agrees with the findings and conclusions of the magistrate judge.

Accordingly, it is ORDERED that the report and recommendation (ECF No. 7) is ADOPTED, and the complaint is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE.


Summaries of

Sutherby v. City of Southgate

United States District Court, E.D. Michigan, Southern Division
Feb 22, 2024
No. 23-13112 (E.D. Mich. Feb. 22, 2024)
Case details for

Sutherby v. City of Southgate

Case Details

Full title:KEVIN CHARLES SUTHERBY and SHERI M. FRICKE BAKER, Plaintiffs, v. CITY OF…

Court:United States District Court, E.D. Michigan, Southern Division

Date published: Feb 22, 2024

Citations

No. 23-13112 (E.D. Mich. Feb. 22, 2024)