From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Sussman v. State

Supreme Court of Florida
Jan 9, 2009
1 So. 3d 173 (Fla. 2009)

Opinion

No. SC08-2134.

January 9, 2009.

Lower Tribunal No(s). 5D08-223.


Because petitioner has failed to show a clear legal right to the reinstatement of Sussman v. State, No. 5D08-223, he is not entitled to mandamus relief. Accordingly, the petition for writ of mandamus is hereby denied. See Huffman v. State, 813 So. 2d 10, 11 (Fla. 2000).

WELLS, PARIENTE, CANADY, and POLSTON, JJ., and ANSTEAD, Senior Justice, concur.


Summaries of

Sussman v. State

Supreme Court of Florida
Jan 9, 2009
1 So. 3d 173 (Fla. 2009)
Case details for

Sussman v. State

Case Details

Full title:DAVID CHARLES SUSSMAN, Petitioner(s) v. STATE OF FLORIDA, Respondent(s)

Court:Supreme Court of Florida

Date published: Jan 9, 2009

Citations

1 So. 3d 173 (Fla. 2009)