From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Sussman v. Soleil Mgmt.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA
Nov 16, 2019
Case No. 2:18-cv-02218-JAD-BNW (D. Nev. Nov. 16, 2019)

Opinion

Case No. 2:18-cv-02218-JAD-BNW

11-16-2019

Mitchell Reed Sussman, Plaintiff v. Soleil Management, LLC, et al., Defendants


Order Adopting Report and Recommendation and Denying Motion for Leave to Amend

[ECF Nos. 63, 100]

Defendants Club De Soleil Vacation Club and Tahiti Village Vacation Club move for leave to amend their answers so that they can assert counterclaims in this case. Magistrate Judge Brenda Weksler has thoughtfully considered the parties' briefing and recommends that I deny the motion. The deadline to challenge that recommendation passed without objection or any request to extend the deadline to file one. "[N]o review is required of a magistrate judge's report and recommendation unless objections are filed."

ECF No. 63.

ECF No. 100.

Schmidt v. Johnstone, 263 F. Supp. 2d 1219, 1226 (D. Ariz. 2003); see also Thomas v. Arn, 474 U.S. 140, 150 (1985); United States v. Reyna-Tapia, 328 F.3d 1114, 1121 (9th Cir. 2003).

IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that the magistrate judge's report and recommendation [ECF No. 100] is ADOPTED in full and the Motion for Leave to Amend Defendants' Answers [ECF No. 63] is DENIED for the reasons stated in the R&R.

ECF No. 100. --------

Dated: November 16, 2019

/s/_________

U.S. District Judge Jennifer A. Dorsey


Summaries of

Sussman v. Soleil Mgmt.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA
Nov 16, 2019
Case No. 2:18-cv-02218-JAD-BNW (D. Nev. Nov. 16, 2019)
Case details for

Sussman v. Soleil Mgmt.

Case Details

Full title:Mitchell Reed Sussman, Plaintiff v. Soleil Management, LLC, et al.…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA

Date published: Nov 16, 2019

Citations

Case No. 2:18-cv-02218-JAD-BNW (D. Nev. Nov. 16, 2019)