From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Sussman v. Rosenblum

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
May 1, 1899
40 App. Div. 618 (N.Y. App. Div. 1899)

Opinion

May Term, 1899.


The present rule is that pleadings should be construed with reasonable liberality. So construed, we are of opinion that the counterclaim intended to charge an assault arising out of the same affray for which the defendant is sued by the plaintiff. The interlocutory judgment should be affirmed, with costs to the respondent to abide the final event of the action. All concurred.


Summaries of

Sussman v. Rosenblum

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
May 1, 1899
40 App. Div. 618 (N.Y. App. Div. 1899)
Case details for

Sussman v. Rosenblum

Case Details

Full title:Sarah Sussman, Appellant, v. James Rosenblum, Respondent

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: May 1, 1899

Citations

40 App. Div. 618 (N.Y. App. Div. 1899)
58 N.Y.S. 1150