From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Susquehanna Commercial Finance, Inc. v. French

United States District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
May 5, 2011
CIVIL ACTION NO. 10-7481 (E.D. Pa. May. 5, 2011)

Summary

granting default judgment where defendants asserted deficient service because, in part, it was “clear that Defendants have intentionally attempted to evade service in this case. It appears they are doing everything possible to avoid this litigation”

Summary of this case from In re Irish Bank Resolution Corp. Ltd.

Opinion

CIVIL ACTION NO. 10-7481.

May 5, 2011


ORDER


AND NOW, this 5th day of May, 2011, upon consideration of Plaintiff's Motion for Default Judgment (ECF No. 8), Plaintiff's Motion is GRANTED. It is hereby ORDERED as follows:

1. Judgment is entered in favor of Plaintiff Susquehanna Commercial Finance, Inc., and against Defendant Michael E. French d/b/a Hiram Waste and Recycling, in the sum of $80,041.00.
2. Judgment is entered in favor of Plaintiff Susquehanna Commercial Finance, Inc., and against Defendant Laura D. French, in the sum of $80,041.00.
3. Plaintiff is entitled to immediately remove and repossess the following items: (1) D5600 Wood Series Shred-All with Longer/Wider Output Conveyor; (1) Magnetic Head Pulley for Wider Output Conveyor; (1) M60 Colorizer; (1) 1.5 Inch Screen; (1) 2.0 Inch Screen; (1) 2" Screen Baffles; (2) ME56 Mulch Elevator w/13 HP Honda Engine w/Electric Start; and (2) Magnetic Head Pulley w/Collection Pan Option.
A. Upon taking possession of said items, within a commercially reasonable time, Plaintiff shall conduct a sale of said items in accordance with all applicable provisions of the Uniform Commercial Code.
B. Plaintiff shall deduct the net proceeds of said sale from the judgment herein entered, and return any excess proceeds to Defendants in the event that the judgment is satisfied.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Susquehanna Commercial Finance, Inc. v. French

United States District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
May 5, 2011
CIVIL ACTION NO. 10-7481 (E.D. Pa. May. 5, 2011)

granting default judgment where defendants asserted deficient service because, in part, it was “clear that Defendants have intentionally attempted to evade service in this case. It appears they are doing everything possible to avoid this litigation”

Summary of this case from In re Irish Bank Resolution Corp. Ltd.
Case details for

Susquehanna Commercial Finance, Inc. v. French

Case Details

Full title:SUSQUEHANNA COMMERCIAL FINANCE, INC. v. MICHAEL E. FRENCH d/b/a HIRAM…

Court:United States District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania

Date published: May 5, 2011

Citations

CIVIL ACTION NO. 10-7481 (E.D. Pa. May. 5, 2011)

Citing Cases

Zahm & Matson, Inc. v. Challener

" Com. ex rel. Anderson v. Fidelity & Deposit Co. of Md., 811 A.2d 1040, 1042 (Pa. Super. Ct. 2002) (quoting…

United States v. Bogart

the following defenses by motion: [] insufficient service of process . . . ." Fed. Rule. Civ. Pro. 12(b)(5),…