Rancheria v. Leavitt

5 Citing cases

  1. Hualapai Indian Tribe v. Haaland

    No. CV-24-08154-PCT-DJH (D. Ariz. Nov. 5, 2024)

    “Status quo is defined as the last, uncontested status which preceded the pending controversy.” Susanville Indian Rancheria v. Leavitt, 2007 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 18702, at *21 (E.D. Cal. Feb. 28, 2007) (quoting Regents of the Univ. of Cal., 747 F.2d 511, 514 (9th Cir 1984))

  2. Overstreet v. Lucid U.S. Inc.

    No. CV-24-01356-PHX-DJH (D. Ariz. Sep. 13, 2024)   Cited 1 times

    “Status quo is defined as the last, uncontested status which preceded the pending controversy.” Susanville Indian Rancheria v. Leavitt, 2007 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 18702, at *21 (E.D. Cal. Feb. 28, 2007) (quoting Regents of the Univ. of Cal., 747 F.2d 511, 514 (9th Cir 1984))

  3. Hualapai Indian Tribe v. Haaland

    No. CV-24-08154-PCT-DJH (D. Ariz. Aug. 22, 2024)

    “Status quo is defined as the last, uncontested status which preceded the pending controversy.” Susanville Indian Rancheria v. Leavitt, 2007 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 18702, at *21 (E.D. Cal. Feb. 28, 2007) (quoting Regents of the Univ. of Cal., 747 F.2d 511, 514 (9th Cir 1984)

  4. Conventus Orthopaedics Inc. v. Fusion Orthopedics U.S.

    No. CV-24-01773-PHX-DJH (D. Ariz. Aug. 1, 2024)

    “Status quo is defined as the last, uncontested status which preceded the pending controversy.” Susanville Indian Rancheria v. Leavitt, 2007 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 18702, at *21 (E.D. Cal. Feb. 28, 2007) (quoting Regents of the Univ. of Cal., 747 F.2d 511, 514 (9th Cir 1984).

  5. JTH Tax LLC v. Anderson

    No. CV-23-00209-PHX-DJH (D. Ariz. Feb. 17, 2023)

    “Status quo is defined as the last, uncontested status which preceded the pending controversy.” Susanville Indian Rancheria v. Leavitt, 2007 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 18702, at *21 (E.D. Cal. Feb. 28, 2007) (quoting Regents of the Univ. of Cal., 747 F.2d 511, 514 (9th Cir 1984).