Opinion
2:20-CV-00103-GMN-VCF
01-12-2022
SUSAN HOY, as Guardian Ad Litem for J.M. and I.M. minors, Plaintiffs v. ANDREA HERNANDES, WALDO HERNANDEZ, LISA BROCHU, KIM KALLAS, LISA RUIZ-LEE, PAULA HAMMACK, DOE individuals I-X ROE CLARK COCUNTY DEPARTMENT OF FAMILY SERVICES EMPLOYEES XI-XX individually and in their official capacities COUNTY OF CLARK, a political subdivision of the State of Nevada, and ZOE CORPORATIONS XXI-XXX Defendants CLARK COUNTY, Cross-Claimant v. ANDREA HERNANDEZ; WALDO HERNANDEZ; MOES 1-10; and MOE CORPORATIONS 11-20, Cross-Defendants ANDREA HERNANDEZ, WALDO HERNANDEZ, Cross-Claimants, v. CLARK COUNTY, Cross-Defendant.
FELICIA GALATI, ESQ. Nevada Bar No. 7341 OLSON CANNON GORMLEY & STOBERSKI Attorneys for Defendants COUNTY OF CLARK, KIM KALLAS, LISA RUIZ-LEE AND PAULA HAMMACK Marjorie Hauf, Esq. Nevada Bar No. 8111 Cara Xidis, Esq. Nevada Bar No. 11743 H&P Law Attorneys for the Plaintiffs Felicia Galati, Esq. Nevada Bar No. 7341 Olson Cannon Gormley & Stoberski Attorney for Defendants, Lisa Ruiz-Lee, Paula Hammack, Kim Kallas and County of Clark Jonathan Blum. Esq, Nevada Bar No. 9515 Attorney for Defendant, Lisa Brochu Julie Funai, Esq. Nevada Bar No. 8725 Attorneys for Defendants, Andrea Hernandez and Waldo Hernandez
FELICIA GALATI, ESQ. Nevada Bar No. 7341 OLSON CANNON GORMLEY & STOBERSKI Attorneys for Defendants COUNTY OF CLARK, KIM KALLAS, LISA RUIZ-LEE AND PAULA HAMMACK
Marjorie Hauf, Esq. Nevada Bar No. 8111 Cara Xidis, Esq. Nevada Bar No. 11743 H&P Law Attorneys for the Plaintiffs
Felicia Galati, Esq. Nevada Bar No. 7341 Olson Cannon Gormley & Stoberski Attorney for Defendants, Lisa Ruiz-Lee, Paula Hammack, Kim Kallas and County of Clark
Jonathan Blum. Esq, Nevada Bar No. 9515 Attorney for Defendant, Lisa Brochu
Julie Funai, Esq. Nevada Bar No. 8725 Attorneys for Defendants, Andrea Hernandez and Waldo Hernandez
STIPULATION AND ORDER TO EXTEND DISCOVERY DEADLINES (EIGHTH REQUEST)
This Stipulation is being submitted because the parties inadvertently forgot to include the close of discovery deadline in their Stipulation filed on 1/11/2022. (ECF NO. 83). Pursuant to Fed R. Civ. P. 6, Fed.R.Civ.P. 26, LRIA 6-1, LRIA 6-2, LR 7-1, and LR 26-4, the parties, by and through their respective counsel of record, stipulate and agree that there is good cause to extend the close of discovery deadline for the reasons stated in the prior Stipulation (ECF No. 83) and consistent with this the Court's Order (ECF No. 84) filed on 1/12/2022 establishing the new discovery deadlines except for the close of discovery, which the parties inadvertently did not include.
I- Pursuant to LR 26-4(d), the parties stipulate to the following proposed schedule for completing all remaining discovery;
The parties agree to extend all the relevant discovery deadlines by four weeks, as set forth below:
1. Extend the Close of Discovery date from 3/10/2022 to 4/7/2022;
2. All the other case deadlines established by this Court's Order (ECF No. 84) remain the same.
ORDER
IT IS SO ORDERED