Opinion
May, 1923.
Judgment affirmed, without costs. No opinion. Manning, Kelby and Young, JJ., concur; Kelly, P.J., and Kapper, J., dissent upon the ground that the provisions of the will are not inconsistent with the plaintiff's right to dower.
From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research
Surpless v. Surpless
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
May 1, 1923
206 App. Div. 717 (N.Y. App. Div. 1923)
Summaries of
Surpless v. Surpless
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
May 1, 1923
206 App. Div. 717 (N.Y. App. Div. 1923)
Case details for
Surpless v. Surpless
Case Details
Full title:CATHARINE L. SURPLESS, Appellant, v. OLIVER BOYD SURPLESS and Others…
Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Date published: May 1, 1923
Citations
206 App. Div. 717 (N.Y. App. Div. 1923)