Opinion
February 15, 1967
Appeal from the Civil Court of the City of New York, County of Queens, ERIC J. TREULICH, J.
Hargous De Santis for appellant.
The medical payments provision of the insurance policy herein involved did not specifically provide for payment of chiropractic services. There was no competent medical proof that such services were a necessary medical expense. The chiropractor was not qualified to testify that in his opinion the treatment rendered by him was a necessary medical expense arising from the accident. (Cf. Education Law, § 6558, subd. 2; § 6550, subd. 4; 6501, subd. 4; Matter of Riddett v. Allen, 23 A.D.2d 458, 460.)
The judgment should be unanimously reversed, without costs, and a new trial ordered.
Concur — GULOTTA, McDONALD and BRENNER, JJ.
Judgment reversed, etc.