From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Surgeon v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division One
Apr 19, 1994
873 S.W.2d 682 (Mo. Ct. App. 1994)

Opinion

No. 63967.

April 19, 1994.

APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT, CITY OF ST. LOUIS; ANNA C. FORDER, JUDGE.

Ellen H. Flottman, Office of the State Public Defender, Columbia, for appellant.

Jeremiah W. (Jay) Nixon, Atty. Gen., Becky Owenson Kilpatrick, Asst. Atty. Gen., Jefferson City, for respondent.

Before CRANDALL, P.J., and REINHARD and CRIST, JJ.


ORDER


Defendant appeals the denial of his Rule 29.15 motion. We affirm. We find no error of law. Rule 84.16(b)(5). Further, we find the findings of fact issued by the motion court in denying Defendant's motion are not clearly erroneous. Rule 84.16(b)(2).

An opinion in this case would have no precedential value. Therefore, we affirm by written order. Rule 84.16(b). A memorandum has been issued to the parties for their use only.


Summaries of

Surgeon v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division One
Apr 19, 1994
873 S.W.2d 682 (Mo. Ct. App. 1994)
Case details for

Surgeon v. State

Case Details

Full title:WILLIE SURGEON, APPELLANT, v. STATE OF MISSOURI, RESPONDENT

Court:Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division One

Date published: Apr 19, 1994

Citations

873 S.W.2d 682 (Mo. Ct. App. 1994)