Opinion
October 3, 1945.
Present — Taylor, P.J., Harris, McCurn, Larkin and Love, JJ. [See post, p. 1010.]
Order affirmed, with $10 costs and disbursements. All concur. (The order denies defendant's motion to dismiss plaintiff's complaint.)
From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research
Surace v. Pfaudler Company
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Oct 3, 1945
269 App. Div. 962 (N.Y. App. Div. 1945)
Summaries of
Surace v. Pfaudler Company
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Oct 3, 1945
269 App. Div. 962 (N.Y. App. Div. 1945)
Case details for
Surace v. Pfaudler Company
Case Details
Full title:DOMINIC F. SURACE, Respondent, v. PFAUDLER COMPANY, Appellant
Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Date published: Oct 3, 1945
Citations
269 App. Div. 962 (N.Y. App. Div. 1945)
Citing Cases
Scardino v. Ring Optical Co.
The motion was properly denied. (See Soporito v. Hetzler Foundries, Inc., 269 App. Div. 962, affd. 295 N.Y.…