Opinion
2:21-cv-02184-JAD-BNW
08-18-2023
JOHN L. SUPROCK, an individual, LAURIE L. SUPROCK, an individual, CONSORTIUM LLC, a South Dakota limited liability company, and RENEWABLE ENERGY NOW, LLC, a Montana limited liability company, Plaintiffs, v. QUANTUM ENERGY, INC., a Nevada corporation, and CLEARTRUST, LLC, a Florida limited liability company, Defendants.
JONATHAN D. BLUM, ESQ. Nevada Bar No. 09515 WILEY PETERSEN Samuel L. Butt (admittedpro hac vice) Joshua D. Wurtzel (admittedpro hac vice) SCHLAM STONE & DOLAN LLP Attorneys for Plaintiffs John Suprock, Laurie Suprock, Consortium LLC, and Renewable Energy Now, LLC FENNEMORE CRAIG, P.C. Christopher H. Byrd Chelsie A. Adams FENNEMORE CRAIG, P.C. David A. Timchak (admitted pro hac vice) Attorneys for Defendant Quantum Energy, Inc.
JONATHAN D. BLUM, ESQ.
Nevada Bar No. 09515
WILEY PETERSEN
Samuel L. Butt (admittedpro hac vice)
Joshua D. Wurtzel (admittedpro hac vice)
SCHLAM STONE & DOLAN LLP
Attorneys for Plaintiffs John Suprock, Laurie Suprock, Consortium LLC, and Renewable Energy Now, LLC
FENNEMORE CRAIG, P.C.
Christopher H. Byrd
Chelsie A. Adams
FENNEMORE CRAIG, P.C.
David A. Timchak (admitted pro hac vice)
Attorneys for Defendant Quantum Energy, Inc.
STIPULATION AND ORDER TO EXTEND BRIEFING DEADLINES
ECF NO. 77
Plaintiffs John L. Suprock (“Mr. Suprock”), Laurie L. Suprock (“Mrs. Suprock”), Consortium LLC (“Consortium”), and Renewable Energy Now, LLC (“Renewable Energy” and, collectively, with Mr. Suprock, Mrs. Suprock, and Consortium, “Plaintiffs”) and Defendant Quantum Energy, Inc. (“Defendant” and, collectively with Plaintiffs, the “Parties”), by and through their counsel of record, jointly move the Court to extend the deadlines for oppositions and replies to the Parties' respective motions for summary judgment filed on July 7, 2023 (ECF Nos. 71 and 72, the “Motions”).
1. Pursuant to LRIA 6-1, this is the Parties' second joint request to extend deadlines with respect to the Motions. The extension is requested because counsel for both Parties have other professional obligations necessitating the extension.
2. The continuance requested herein is not sought for the purposes of delay and will not result in prejudice to the Parties or the Court.
3. Accordingly, the Parties jointly request that the Court continue all deadlines in accordance with the below schedule:
Deadline
Current Date
Proposed New Date
Opposition to Motions
August 18, 2023, 2023
August 25, 2023
Replies In Further Support of Motions
Somber 1, 2023
September 8,2023
IT IS SO STIPULATED.
IT IS SO ORDERED.