From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Supreme Forest Woodman Circle v. Dugan

Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Apr 11, 1916
156 P. 1194 (Okla. 1916)

Opinion

No. 6277

Opinion Filed April 11, 1916.

APPEAL AND ERROR — Briefs — Effect of Failure to File. Where defendant in error files no brief, and the brief of plantiff in error reasonably sustains his contention, the court will not examine the record to find some theory upon which to affirm the judgment, but same may be reversed and remanded.

(Syllabus by Hooker, C.)

Error from District Court, Pottawatomie County; Chas. B. Wilson, Judge.

Action between the Supreme Forest Woodman Circle and John W. Dugan. From the judgment, the Supreme Forest Woodman Circle brings error. Reversed and remanded.

N.B. Maxey, for plaintiff in error.


The plaintiff in error filed a well-prepared brief in this cause, but no brief has been filed by the defendant in error; neither has any extension of time in which to file briefs been asked for, nor any excuse given as to why a brief has not been filed, and as the errors assigned by plaintiff in error seem to be supported by the record, this cause is reversed and remanded.

By the Court: It is so ordered.


Summaries of

Supreme Forest Woodman Circle v. Dugan

Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Apr 11, 1916
156 P. 1194 (Okla. 1916)
Case details for

Supreme Forest Woodman Circle v. Dugan

Case Details

Full title:SUPREME FOREST WOODMAN CIRCLE v. DUGAN

Court:Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Date published: Apr 11, 1916

Citations

156 P. 1194 (Okla. 1916)
156 P. 1194

Citing Cases

United States Fidelity Guaranty Co. v. Walker

The defendant in error has not filed any brief, although he has obtained an extension of time twice, and the…

Stephens v. Byrd

We have given the plaintiff in error's brief a careful examination and it appears to sustain the assignments…