From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Superville v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District
Sep 29, 1994
642 So. 2d 1193 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1994)

Opinion

No. 94-1228.

September 29, 1994.

An Appeal from the Circuit Court for Escambia County. Nickolas Geeker, Judge.

Nancy A. Daniels, Public Defender, David P. Gauldin, Asst. Public Defender, Tallahassee, for appellant.

Robert A. Butterworth, Atty. Gen., Daniel A. David, Asst. Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, for appellee.


The order of the trial court adjudging appellant guilty of direct criminal contempt is reversed upon the authority of Harris v. United States, 382 U.S. 162, 86 S.Ct. 352, 15 L.Ed.2d 240 (1965) and Pendley v. State, 392 So.2d 321 (Fla. 1st DCA 1980), and the cause is remanded for further proceedings consistent with Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.840. Upon remand, should appellant be convicted of indirect criminal contempt, the maximum penalty imposed without trial by jury shall not exceed six months' imprisonment. Martinez v. State, 339 So.2d 1133 (Fla. 2d DCA 1976), affirmed, 346 So.2d 68 (Fla. 1977); Butler v. State, 330 So.2d 244 (Fla. 2d DCA 1976), cert. denied, 429 U.S. 863, 97 S.Ct. 168, 50 L.Ed.2d 142 (1976).

REVERSED AND REMANDED.

ALLEN and KAHN, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Superville v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District
Sep 29, 1994
642 So. 2d 1193 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1994)
Case details for

Superville v. State

Case Details

Full title:JAMES FRANCIS SUPERVILLE, APPELLANT, v. STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District

Date published: Sep 29, 1994

Citations

642 So. 2d 1193 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1994)

Citing Cases

McCrimager v. State

As to the sentence, it is well settled that a six-month sentence is proper for a contempt conviction entered…