In Whitfield, the Court determined that where the trial court imposed a new sentence for a violation of probation even though probation was never imposed, the mistake was apparent from the Quarter Session notes in the record and, thus, was "patent and obvious." Id.
Summary of this case from Commonwealth v. Murph2003
In Whitfield, the Court determined that where the trial court imposed a new sentence for a violation of probation even though probation was never imposed, the mistake was apparent from the Quarter Session notes in the record and, thus, was "patent and obvious." Id.
Summary of this case from Commonwealth v. MurphIn Whitfield, the defendant pled guilty to theft and was sentenced to an 11 1/2 to 23 month term of imprisonment, for which no probation was imposed.
Summary of this case from Commonwealth of Pa. v. JacksonIn Whitfield, the defendant pled guilty to theft and was sentenced to an 11½ to 23 month term of imprisonment, for which no probation was imposed.
Summary of this case from Com. v. JacksonFull title:SUPERIOR COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA
Court:Superior Court of Pennsylvania
Date published: Jan 1, 2003
On August 15, 2003, the Superior Court affirmed the PCRA court. See Commonwealth v. Weber, 833 A.2d 1152…
Williams v. PennsylvaniaSuper. Ct. Pa. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 833 A. 2d 1152.…