From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Superb Gen. Contr. Co. v. City of New York

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
May 5, 2009
62 A.D.3d 423 (N.Y. App. Div. 2009)

Opinion

No. 497.

May 5, 2009.

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Bernard J. Fried, J.), entered July 18, 2008, which granted defendant City's motion for summary judgment dismissing the first cause of action and granted the other defendants' cross motion to dismiss the entire complaint against the Amherst defendants, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

Agovino § Asselta, LLP, Mineola (Robert C. Buff of counsel), for appellant.

Michael A. Cardozo, Corporation Counsel, New York (Karen M. Griffin of counsel), for City of New York, respondent.

Landman Corsi Ballaine § Ford P.C., New York (Christopher G. Fretel of counsel), for Amherst Rehab Associates, Inc. and Amherst Development Services Corporation, respondents.

Before: Tom, J.P., Andrias, Saxe, Moskowitz and DeGrasse, JJ.


On a prior order ( 39 AD3d 204, lv dismissed 10 NY3d 800), we dismissed the second through seventh causes of action against the City and the entire complaint against defendant S.J. Rehab, under the statute of limitations. That ruling constituted law of the case, precluding plaintiff from raising the issue on the present appeal ( see Clark Constr. Corp. v BLF Realty Holding Corp., 54 AD3d 604; J-Mar Serv. Ctr, Inc. v Mahoney, Connor Hussey, 45 AD3d 809), and plaintiff even conceded as much.


Summaries of

Superb Gen. Contr. Co. v. City of New York

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
May 5, 2009
62 A.D.3d 423 (N.Y. App. Div. 2009)
Case details for

Superb Gen. Contr. Co. v. City of New York

Case Details

Full title:SUPERB GENERAL CONTRACTING CO., Appellant, v. CITY OF NEW YORK et al.…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: May 5, 2009

Citations

62 A.D.3d 423 (N.Y. App. Div. 2009)
2009 N.Y. Slip Op. 3619
877 N.Y.S.2d 687

Citing Cases

Superb v. City

Decided September 8, 2009. Appeal from the 1st Dept: 62 AD3d 423; 39 AD3d 204. Motions for Leave to Appeal…

Jan S. v. Leonard S.

This determination, which was not appealed from, constitutes the law of the case. ( See Hass Gottlieb v Sook…