From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Super-Tek USA, LLC v. O'Sullivan Industries, Inc.

United States District Court, N.D. Illinois, Eastern Division
Mar 5, 2007
No. 07 C 1184 (N.D. Ill. Mar. 5, 2007)

Opinion

No. 07 C 1184.

March 5, 2007


MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER


After nearly a decade of increasingly sharp criticisms on the subject emanating from our Court of Appeals — ranging fromCosgrove v. Bartolotta, 150 F.3d 729, 731 (7th Cir. 1998) to Wise v. Wachovia Sec., LLC, 450 F.3d 265, 267 (7th Cir. 2006), with a good many intervening opinions delivering the selfsame message — it is well past time to hold federal practitioners (who should know better) responsible for their irresponsibility. In accordance with this Court's unflagging obligation as described in such cases as Cook v. Winfrey, 141 F.3d 322, 325 (7th Cir. 1998), this action is dismissed for lack of subject matter jurisdiction (the absence of properly alleged diversity of citizenship).


Summaries of

Super-Tek USA, LLC v. O'Sullivan Industries, Inc.

United States District Court, N.D. Illinois, Eastern Division
Mar 5, 2007
No. 07 C 1184 (N.D. Ill. Mar. 5, 2007)
Case details for

Super-Tek USA, LLC v. O'Sullivan Industries, Inc.

Case Details

Full title:SUPER-TEK USA, LLC, Plaintiff, v. O'SULLIVAN INDUSTRIES, INC., Defendant

Court:United States District Court, N.D. Illinois, Eastern Division

Date published: Mar 5, 2007

Citations

No. 07 C 1184 (N.D. Ill. Mar. 5, 2007)