From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Supanich v. Rundle

United States District Court, W.D. Washington, at Tacoma
Apr 15, 2010
NO. C10-5008 RBL (W.D. Wash. Apr. 15, 2010)

Opinion

NO. C10-5008 RBL.

April 15, 2010

By: Timothy L. Ashcraft, WSBA #26196, Attorneys for Defendants Julia Kay and John Doe Kay, WILLIAMS, KASTNER GIBBS PLLC, Tacoma, WA.


ORDER GRANTING MOTION FOR RELIEF FROM FRCP 26(d) REGARDING TIMING AND SEQUENCE OF DISCOVERY


THIS MATTER, having come before the court on Defendant Kay's Motion for Relief from FRCP 26(d) [Dkt. #13], the court having considered the pleadings and papers on file herein including Plaintiff's Motion for an Extension of Time [Dkt. #24] and the Declaration of Timothy L. Ashcraft, the court being fully advised in the premises, now, therefore,

IT IS ORDERED that defendant Kay's Motion for Relief from FRCP 26(d) is granted. Defendants Kay may send a discovery request to Defendant Rundle requesting all documents from the Pierce County Superior Court paternity/custody dispute(s) between plaintiff Supanich and defendant Pedigo, as well as all documents related to the criminal case involving Mr. Supanich arising out of this same custody issue.

It is further ORDERED that this request can occur immediately upon receipt of this order.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Supanich v. Rundle

United States District Court, W.D. Washington, at Tacoma
Apr 15, 2010
NO. C10-5008 RBL (W.D. Wash. Apr. 15, 2010)
Case details for

Supanich v. Rundle

Case Details

Full title:MARK SUPANICH, a single man individually and as guardian for S.S., a minor…

Court:United States District Court, W.D. Washington, at Tacoma

Date published: Apr 15, 2010

Citations

NO. C10-5008 RBL (W.D. Wash. Apr. 15, 2010)