From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

SunTrust Mortg., Inc. v. Ostendorff

STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA In The Court of Appeals
May 31, 2017
Appellate Case No. 2015-000198 (S.C. Ct. App. May. 31, 2017)

Opinion

Appellate Case No. 2015-000198 Unpublished Opinion No. 2017-UP-234

05-31-2017

SunTrust Mortgage, Inc., Respondent, v. Mark Ostendorff, Appellant

Mark Ostendorff, of Central, pro se. Brian Steed Tatum, of Tatum Law firm, PLLC, of Charlotte, North Carolina, for Respondent.


THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE. IT SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR. Appeal From York County
S. Jackson Kimball, III, Master-in-Equity

APPEAL DISMISSED

Mark Ostendorff, of Central, pro se. Brian Steed Tatum, of Tatum Law firm, PLLC, of Charlotte, North Carolina, for Respondent. PER CURIAM : We dismiss this appeal pursuant to Rule 220(b), SCACR, and Shields v. Martin Marietta Corp., 303 S.C. 469, 470, 402 S.E.2d 482, 483 (1991) (holding an order restoring a case to the active docket is not directly appealable). AFFIRMED. LOCKEMY, C.J., and HUFF and THOMAS, JJ., concur.

We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to Rule 215, SCACR. --------


Summaries of

SunTrust Mortg., Inc. v. Ostendorff

STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA In The Court of Appeals
May 31, 2017
Appellate Case No. 2015-000198 (S.C. Ct. App. May. 31, 2017)
Case details for

SunTrust Mortg., Inc. v. Ostendorff

Case Details

Full title:SunTrust Mortgage, Inc., Respondent, v. Mark Ostendorff, Appellant

Court:STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA In The Court of Appeals

Date published: May 31, 2017

Citations

Appellate Case No. 2015-000198 (S.C. Ct. App. May. 31, 2017)