From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Suntrust Bank v. Nantz

United States District Court, M.D. Florida, Fort Myers Division
Jun 13, 2011
Case No. 2:11-cv-145-FtM-36SPC (M.D. Fla. Jun. 13, 2011)

Opinion

Case No. 2:11-cv-145-FtM-36SPC.

June 13, 2011


ORDER


This matter comes before the Court on the Plaintiff, Suntrust Bank's Motion for Entry of a Clerk's Default against the Defendant Rex A. Nantz (Doc. #9) filed on June 9, 2011. Under Fed.R.Civ.P. 55(a), default is justified "[w]hen a party against whom a judgment for affirmative relief is sought has failed to plead or otherwise appear by affidavit or otherwise, the clerk shall enter the party's default."

As grounds, the Plaintiff states the Defendant, Rex A. Nantz, was served with a summons and Complaint on March 8, 2011. The Defendant Nantz has failed to file a responsive pleading or Rule 12(b) motion within twenty-one (21) days as required by Fed.R.Civ.P. 12.

A review of the return of service shows that the summons properly served on an individual of the proper age at the Defendant's residence. Thus, good cause exists to grant the Clerk's Default.

Accordingly, it is now

ORDERED:

The Plaintiff, Suntrust Bank's Motion for Entry of a Clerk's Default against the Defendant Rex A. Nantz (Doc. #9) is GRANTED. The Clerk of the Court is hereby directed to enter a Clerk's Default against the Defendant Rex A. Nantz.

DONE AND ORDERED at Fort Myers, Florida.


Summaries of

Suntrust Bank v. Nantz

United States District Court, M.D. Florida, Fort Myers Division
Jun 13, 2011
Case No. 2:11-cv-145-FtM-36SPC (M.D. Fla. Jun. 13, 2011)
Case details for

Suntrust Bank v. Nantz

Case Details

Full title:SUNTRUST BANK, Plaintiff, v. REX A. NANTZ, also known as REX ALLEN NANTZ…

Court:United States District Court, M.D. Florida, Fort Myers Division

Date published: Jun 13, 2011

Citations

Case No. 2:11-cv-145-FtM-36SPC (M.D. Fla. Jun. 13, 2011)