Opinion
No. 1:02CV2320
November 26, 2002
ORDER
This matter is before the Court via teleconference upon the plaintiffs' motion for temporary restraining order. (ECF 1). The Court finds that plaintiffs have not shown that a temporary restraining order is appropriate, plaintiffs have not demonstrated (1) a likelihood of success on the merits, (2) irreparable injury, (3) that granting the relief requested will not cause substantial harm to others, and (4) that the public interest will be served by granting the relief requested. See Memphis Planned Parenthood, Inc. v. Sundquist, 175 F.3d 456, 460 (6th Cir. 1999); Kallstrom v. Columbus, 136 F.3d 1055, 1067 (6th Cir. 1998)
Accordingly, plaintiffs' motion for temporary restraining order is denied.
IT IS SO ORDERED.