From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Sunrise Club v. Shapo

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District
Aug 8, 2001
790 So. 2d 1231 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2001)

Opinion

Case No. 3D01-261

Opinion filed August 8, 2001.

An Appeal from the Circuit Court for Miami-Dade County, Barbara S. Levenson, Judge. Lower Tribunal No. 00-14386.

Kipnis Tescher Lippman Valinsky, and Howard A. Tescher (Fort Lauderdale), for appellants.

Mitrani, Rynor, Adamsky, Macaulay Zorrilla, and Isaac J. Mitrani, and Pamela A. Chamberlin, for appellees.

Before GERSTEN, RAMIREZ, and NESBITT, JJ.


We grant the appellees' motion for clarification, withdraw the opinion filed June 20, 2001, and substitute the following:

Appellants appeal a non-final order granting the appellees' motion to stay litigation and compel arbitration. We find the trial judge erred in making factual determinations which were unsupported by the record, without conducting an evidentiary hearing. See Jalis Construction, Inc. v. Mintz, 724 So.2d 1254 (Fla. 4th DCA 1999). Accordingly, we reverse and remand for the trial judge to hold an expedited evidentiary hearing to determine whether any of the appellants are parties to the arbitration agreement and, if so, whether the appellants and the appellees intended to arbitrate the issues which are the subject of the instant action. See Seifert v. U.S. Home Corp., 750 So.2d 633 (Fla. 1999); Loyola Development Limited Company v. M.J. Anderson Construction Corp., 711 So.2d 1336 (Fla. 3d DCA 1998);

Reversed and remanded.


Summaries of

Sunrise Club v. Shapo

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District
Aug 8, 2001
790 So. 2d 1231 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2001)
Case details for

Sunrise Club v. Shapo

Case Details

Full title:THE SUNRISE CLUB, INC., a Florida corporation; SUNDALE LTD., a Florida…

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District

Date published: Aug 8, 2001

Citations

790 So. 2d 1231 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2001)