From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Sundaram v. Macy's Inc.

United States District Court, S.D. New York
Oct 17, 2022
22 Civ. 3275 (PAE) (S.D.N.Y. Oct. 17, 2022)

Opinion

22 Civ. 3275 (PAE)

10-17-2022

DURGAMRITHA T. SUNDARAM, Plaintiff, v. MACY'S INC. et al., Defendants.


ORDER OF DISCONTINUANCE

PAUL A. ENGELMAYER, District Judge:

The Court having been advised, see Dkt. 40, by the parties that plaintiff and defendant Transform SR Brands LLC have reached an agreement in this matter, it is ORDERED that the above-entitled action is hereby dismissed and discontinued without costs, and without prejudice to plaintiffs right to reopen the action within 30 days of the date of this Order as to defendant Transform SR Brands LLC if the settlement is not consummated.

To be clear, any application to reopen must be filed within 30 days of this Order; any application to reopen filed thereafter may be denied solely on that basis. Further, if the parties wish for the Court to retain jurisdiction for the purposes of enforcing any settlement agreement, they must submit the settlement agreement to the Court within the same 30-day period to be “so ordered” by the Court. Per Paragraph 4(C) of the Court's Individual Rules and Practices for Civil Cases, unless the Court orders otherwise, the Court will not retain jurisdiction to enforce a settlement agreement unless it is made part of the public record.

The Clerk of Court is respectfully directed to terminate defendant Transform SR Brands LLC as a party.

SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Sundaram v. Macy's Inc.

United States District Court, S.D. New York
Oct 17, 2022
22 Civ. 3275 (PAE) (S.D.N.Y. Oct. 17, 2022)
Case details for

Sundaram v. Macy's Inc.

Case Details

Full title:DURGAMRITHA T. SUNDARAM, Plaintiff, v. MACY'S INC. et al., Defendants.

Court:United States District Court, S.D. New York

Date published: Oct 17, 2022

Citations

22 Civ. 3275 (PAE) (S.D.N.Y. Oct. 17, 2022)