From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Sunbeam Heating Company, Inc. v. Chambers

Appellate Court of Illinois, First District
Dec 30, 1941
312 Ill. App. 382 (Ill. App. Ct. 1941)

Opinion

Gen. No. 41,633. (Abstract of Decision.)

Opinion filed December 30, 1941 Rehearing denied January 20, 1942

JUDICIAL AND EXECUTION SALES, § 99jurisdiction of the parties by valid process must appear in order to protect innocent purchaser at judicial sale. Where property subject to a prior mortgage was sold on the foreclosure of a mechanic's lien and a decree of sale entered in the proceedings, and subsequently the mortgagors and holder of the mortgage notes filed petitions asking that the cause be opened for hearing and the decree against them be set aside for want of valid service of process, the motion to strike the petitions filed by an innocent purchaser of the premises admitted all allegations well pleaded, and the order striking the petitions was reversed and the cause remanded with directions to the court to find the ultimate facts whether the defendants were actually served, and if they were decree of sale was to stand, and if not, the decree was to be vacated.

See Callaghan's Illinois Digest, same topic and section number.

Appeal from Circuit Court of Cook county; Hon. PHILIP J. FINNEGAN, presiding.

Orders of the circuit court reversed and cause remanded with directions. Heard in second division, first district, this court at February term, 1941.

Albert E. Lake, for appellants;

Joseph B. Gilbert, for appellee.


"Not to be published in full." Opinion filed December 30, 1941; rehearing denied January 20, 1942.


Summaries of

Sunbeam Heating Company, Inc. v. Chambers

Appellate Court of Illinois, First District
Dec 30, 1941
312 Ill. App. 382 (Ill. App. Ct. 1941)
Case details for

Sunbeam Heating Company, Inc. v. Chambers

Case Details

Full title:Sunbeam Heating Company, Inc., Plaintiff, v. Edward W. Chambers et al.…

Court:Appellate Court of Illinois, First District

Date published: Dec 30, 1941

Citations

312 Ill. App. 382 (Ill. App. Ct. 1941)
38 N.E.2d 544

Citing Cases

Woerter v. Halperin

In Krebs v. Thompson, 387 Ill. 471, where likewise no counter-affidavits were filed, it was held that "the…

Heitman Trust Co. v. Parlee

The most that can be claimed by respondent is that the court erred in ordering the chattels to be sold; but…