From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Sun v. Loadholt

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
Mar 13, 2012
469 F. App'x 160 (4th Cir. 2012)

Opinion

No. 11-2292

03-13-2012

JOSEPH C. SUN, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. JOE L. LOADHOLT, Defendant - Appellee, and STACEY SMITH, Defendant.

Joseph C. Sun, Appellant Pro Se. Darrell Thomas Johnson, Jr.; Warren Johnson, Hardeeville, South Carolina, for Appellee.


UNPUBLISHED

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Beaufort. Richard M. Gergel, District Judge. (9:08-cv-04021-RMG)

Before GREGORY, SHEDD, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Joseph C. Sun, Appellant Pro Se. Darrell Thomas Johnson, Jr.; Warren Johnson, Hardeeville, South Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Joseph C. Sun appeals the district court's order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Sun v. Loadholt, No. 9:08-cv-04021-RMG (D.S.C. Nov. 1, 2011). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED


Summaries of

Sun v. Loadholt

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
Mar 13, 2012
469 F. App'x 160 (4th Cir. 2012)
Case details for

Sun v. Loadholt

Case Details

Full title:JOSEPH C. SUN, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. JOE L. LOADHOLT, Defendant …

Court:UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

Date published: Mar 13, 2012

Citations

469 F. App'x 160 (4th Cir. 2012)