From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Sun v. Johnson

United States District Court, District of Nevada
Jan 6, 2022
2:21-cv-02180-APG-EJY (D. Nev. Jan. 6, 2022)

Opinion

2:21-cv-02180-APG-EJY

01-06-2022

JIANMIN SUN, Plaintiff v. RACHEL L. JOHNSON and CARRIE TEAGER, Defendants


ORDER REMANDING CASE

[ECF NOS. 6, 7, 10]

ANDREW P. GORDON, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Defendant Rachel L. Johnson removed this case from the Circuit Court of the Eighteenth Judicial Circuit DuPage County, Illinois. ECF Nos. 1, 1-2. Plaintiff Jianmin Sun moves to dismiss, to remand, and for sanctions. ECF Nos. 6, 7, 10. I remand the case because it was improperly removed to this court. A case may be removed from state court only “to the district court of the United States for the district and division embracing the place where such action is pending.” 28 U.S.C. § 1441(a). The District of Nevada does not embrace DuPage County, Illinois. I therefore remand this case because it was improperly removed to this court. I deny Sun's motion for sanctions because although the removal was plainly improper, Sun does not identify any costs or actual expenses incurred. Sun filed the motions pro se, and thus has not incurred attorney's fees in relation to this action.

I THEREFORE ORDER that this case is remanded to the state court from which it was removed for all further proceedings. All pending motions are denied as moot. The clerk of court is instructed to close this case.


Summaries of

Sun v. Johnson

United States District Court, District of Nevada
Jan 6, 2022
2:21-cv-02180-APG-EJY (D. Nev. Jan. 6, 2022)
Case details for

Sun v. Johnson

Case Details

Full title:JIANMIN SUN, Plaintiff v. RACHEL L. JOHNSON and CARRIE TEAGER, Defendants

Court:United States District Court, District of Nevada

Date published: Jan 6, 2022

Citations

2:21-cv-02180-APG-EJY (D. Nev. Jan. 6, 2022)