From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Sun Studs, Inc. v. ATA Equipment Leasing, Inc.

United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit
Dec 20, 1989
892 F.2d 73 (Fed. Cir. 1989)

Opinion

Nos. 87-1509, 87-1515.

December 20, 1989.

Don H. Marmaduke, of Tonkon, Torp, Galen, Marmaduke Booth, Portland, Or., for plaintiff-appellant. With him on the brief were Barbee B. Lyon, of Tonkon, Torp, Galen, Marmaduke Booth, Portland, Or., and William A. Birdwell, of Spears, Lubersky, Campbell, Bledsoe, Anderson Young, Portland, Or.

David W. Axelrod, of Schwabe, Williamson Wyatt, Portland, Or., for defendants/cross-appellants. With him on the brief was Robert L. Harrington, of Portland, Or.

Appealed from: United States District Court for the District of Oregon.


ORDER

Upon further consideration of the suggestion for rehearing in banc that was accepted on August 16, 1989, 882 F.2d 1583, it now appearing that the acceptance was improvident,

IT IS ORDERED that the suggestion for rehearing in banc be, and the same hereby is, declined. The court's opinion issued on March 31, 1989, appearing at 872 F.2d 978, as modified by order on July 3, 1989, 872 F.2d 994, is reinstated.


Summaries of

Sun Studs, Inc. v. ATA Equipment Leasing, Inc.

United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit
Dec 20, 1989
892 F.2d 73 (Fed. Cir. 1989)
Case details for

Sun Studs, Inc. v. ATA Equipment Leasing, Inc.

Case Details

Full title:SUN STUDS, INC., PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT, v. ATA EQUIPMENT LEASING, INC.…

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit

Date published: Dec 20, 1989

Citations

892 F.2d 73 (Fed. Cir. 1989)

Citing Cases

King Instrument Corp. v. Perego

Each case must be decided in light of the nature and extent of the differences between the accused device and…

In re Lockwood

Connell fails to cite even a single Supreme Court case concerning jury trials.See also Sun Studs, Inc. v. ATA…