From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Sun River Energy, Inc. v. Nelson

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
Apr 10, 2012
Civil Action No. 11-cv-00198-MSK-MEH (D. Colo. Apr. 10, 2012)

Opinion

Civil Action No. 11-cv-00198-MSK-MEH

04-10-2012

SUN RIVER ENERGY, INC., Plaintiff, v. ERIK S. NELSON, STEVE STEPHENS, and CORAL CAPITAL PARTNERS, INC., Defendants.


MINUTE ORDER

Entered by Michael E. Hegarty , United States Magistrate Judge, on April 10, 2012.

Plaintiffs' Motion to Compel Defendants to Respond to Third Set of Written Discovery [filed April 6, 2012; docket #191] is denied without prejudice for failure to comply with Fed. R. Civ. P. 37(a)(1) and D.C. Colo. LCivR 7.1A. See Hoelzel v. First Select Corp., 214 F.R.D. 634, 636 (D. Colo. 2003) (because Rule 7.1A requires meaningful negotiations by the parties, the rule is not satisfied by one party sending the other party a single email, letter or voicemail).


Summaries of

Sun River Energy, Inc. v. Nelson

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
Apr 10, 2012
Civil Action No. 11-cv-00198-MSK-MEH (D. Colo. Apr. 10, 2012)
Case details for

Sun River Energy, Inc. v. Nelson

Case Details

Full title:SUN RIVER ENERGY, INC., Plaintiff, v. ERIK S. NELSON, STEVE STEPHENS, and…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO

Date published: Apr 10, 2012

Citations

Civil Action No. 11-cv-00198-MSK-MEH (D. Colo. Apr. 10, 2012)