Opinion
Civil Action No. 11-cv-00198-MSK-MEH
04-10-2012
MINUTE ORDER
Entered by Michael E. Hegarty , United States Magistrate Judge, on April 10, 2012.
Plaintiffs' Motion to Compel Defendants to Respond to Third Set of Written Discovery [filed April 6, 2012; docket #191] is denied without prejudice for failure to comply with Fed. R. Civ. P. 37(a)(1) and D.C. Colo. LCivR 7.1A. See Hoelzel v. First Select Corp., 214 F.R.D. 634, 636 (D. Colo. 2003) (because Rule 7.1A requires meaningful negotiations by the parties, the rule is not satisfied by one party sending the other party a single email, letter or voicemail).