From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Sun Bank of Ocala v. Ford

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District
Dec 7, 1989
553 So. 2d 368 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1989)

Opinion

No. 89-507.

December 7, 1989.

Appeal from the Circuit Court, Marion County, Raymond T. McNeal, J.

Wayne C. McCall of Ayres, Cluster, Curry, McCall Briggs, P.A., Ocala, for appellant.

Michael J. Cooper, Ocala, for appellee.


This is an appeal from an award of attorneys fees.

The issue in this case is the same as that in Head v. Lane, 541 So.2d 672 (Fla. 4th DCA 1989). That is, can an attorney and his client enter into a partial contingent fee agreement and then have the court assess a "contingency risk factor" against their losing adversary. See Florida Patient's Compensation Fund v. Rowe, 472 So.2d 1145 (Fla. 1985).

We agree with the holding and rationale of Head and certify conflict with First State Insurance Co. v. General Electric Credit Auto Lease, Inc., 518 So.2d 927 (Fla. 3d DCA 1987).

The order denying an enhancement of attorneys fees is affirmed.

AFFIRMED.

SHARP, J., and MILLER, J.D., Associate Judge, concur.


Summaries of

Sun Bank of Ocala v. Ford

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District
Dec 7, 1989
553 So. 2d 368 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1989)
Case details for

Sun Bank of Ocala v. Ford

Case Details

Full title:SUN BANK OF OCALA, APPELLANT, v. JACQUES FORD, APPELLEE

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District

Date published: Dec 7, 1989

Citations

553 So. 2d 368 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1989)

Citing Cases

Sun Bank of Ocala v. Ford

McDONALD, Justice. We review Sun Bank of Ocala v. Ford, 553 So.2d 368 (Fla. 5th DCA 1989), wherein the…