Sumpter v. State

Full title: Darius Sumpter, Movant/Appellant, v. State of Missouri, Respondent.

Court: Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, DIVISION ONE.

Date published: Jul 14, 2015

465 S.W.3d 512 (Mo. Ct. App. 2015)

Opinion

No. ED 101771

2015-07-14

Darius Sumpter, Movant/Appellant, v. State of Missouri, Respondent.

Appeal from the Circuit Court of St. Louis County, Honorable Robert S. Cohen, Judge Andrew E. Zleit, 1010 Market Street, Suite 1100, St. Louis, Missouri 63101, for appellant. Shaun J. Mackelprang, P.O. Box 899, Jefferson City, Missouri 65102, for respondent.

PER CURIAM

Appeal from the Circuit Court of St. Louis County, Honorable Robert S. Cohen, Judge
Andrew E. Zleit, 1010 Market Street, Suite 1100, St. Louis, Missouri 63101, for appellant. Shaun J. Mackelprang, P.O. Box 899, Jefferson City, Missouri 65102, for respondent.
Before Lawrence E. Mooney, P.J., Lisa S. Van Amburg, C.J., and Clifford H. Ahrens, J.

ORDER

PER CURIAM

Darius Sumpter (Movant) appeals the motion court's judgment denying, without an evidentiary hearing, his motion for post-conviction relief under Rule 29.15. We affirm.

The judgment of the motion court is based on findings of fact that were not clearly erroneous. An extended opinion would have no precedential value. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).