From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Sumner v. Marriott Int'l

United States District Court, S.D. New York
Sep 1, 2022
21 cv 6711 (PKC) (S.D.N.Y. Sep. 1, 2022)

Opinion

21 cv 6711 (PKC)

09-01-2022

SARAH SUMNER AND WILF SUMNER, Plaintiffs, v. MARIOTT INTERNATIONAL INC., et al., Defendants.


ORDER OF DISMISSAL

CASTEL, U.S.D.J.

The Court having been advised that all claims asserted herein have been settled in principle, it is ORDERED that the above-entitled action be and is hereby dismissed and discontinued without costs, and without prejudice to the right to reopen the action within sixty

To be clear, any application to reopen must be filed within sixty days of this Order; any application to reopen filed thereafter may be denied solely on that basis. Further, if the parties j wish for the Court to retain jurisdiction for the purposes of enforcing any settlement agreement, they must submit the settlement agreement to the Court within the same thirty-day period to be “so ordered” by the Court. Unless the Court orders otherwise, the Court will not retain jurisdiction to enforce a settlement agreement unless it is made part of the public record.

The pending summary judgment motion (Doc 28) should be terminated as moot. All conferences are vacated. The Clerk of Court is directed to close the case.

SO ORDERED


Summaries of

Sumner v. Marriott Int'l

United States District Court, S.D. New York
Sep 1, 2022
21 cv 6711 (PKC) (S.D.N.Y. Sep. 1, 2022)
Case details for

Sumner v. Marriott Int'l

Case Details

Full title:SARAH SUMNER AND WILF SUMNER, Plaintiffs, v. MARIOTT INTERNATIONAL INC.…

Court:United States District Court, S.D. New York

Date published: Sep 1, 2022

Citations

21 cv 6711 (PKC) (S.D.N.Y. Sep. 1, 2022)