From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Summitwood Associates v. Planning Comm., City, Meriden

Supreme Court of Connecticut
Jun 11, 1997
696 A.2d 343 (Conn. 1997)

Opinion

Decided June 11, 1997


The petition by Victor Scaringe and Anita Scaringe for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court (AC 16899) is granted, limited to the following issue:

"Did the Appellate Court properly hold that the petitioners did not possess a colorable claim to intervene as a party in this action?"

The Supreme Court docket number is SC 15710.

Stephen J. Anderson and Kenneth R. Slater, Jr., in support of the petition.

Robert A. Fuller, in opposition.


Summaries of

Summitwood Associates v. Planning Comm., City, Meriden

Supreme Court of Connecticut
Jun 11, 1997
696 A.2d 343 (Conn. 1997)
Case details for

Summitwood Associates v. Planning Comm., City, Meriden

Case Details

Full title:SUMMITWOOD ASSOCIATES PHASE IV v. PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF…

Court:Supreme Court of Connecticut

Date published: Jun 11, 1997

Citations

696 A.2d 343 (Conn. 1997)
241 Conn. 918

Citing Cases

Summitwood Associates Phase IV v. Planning Comm.

The Scaringes' motion to intervene gave rise to much litigation, going all the way to our Supreme Court. See…