From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Summers v. Wells Fargo Bank NA

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Nov 17, 2011
No. C 11-04147 WHA (N.D. Cal. Nov. 17, 2011)

Opinion

No. C 11-04147 WHA

11-17-2011

CHRISTOPHER JAMAR SUMMERS, Plaintiff, v. WELLS FARGO BANK NA, et al., Defendants.


ORDER TO SHOW

CAUSE AND VACATING

MOTION HEARING

On November 1, 2011, defendant Wells Fargo Bank N.A. filed a motion to dismiss (Dkt. No. 20). Pursuant to Civil Local Rule 7-3, plaintiff's opposition or statement of non-opposition to the motion was due on November 15. None was filed. Accordingly, plaintiff Christopher Jamar Summers is hereby ORDERED TO SHOW CAUSE why his claims against defendant Wells Fargo should not be dismissed for failure to oppose the motion. Plaintiff Christopher Summers must file a written response to this order by DECEMBER 1, 2011 . If no response is filed or if good cause is not shown, then the motion may be granted. The motion hearing previously set for December 15, 2011, is VACATED.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

WILLIAM ALSUP

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

Summers v. Wells Fargo Bank NA

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Nov 17, 2011
No. C 11-04147 WHA (N.D. Cal. Nov. 17, 2011)
Case details for

Summers v. Wells Fargo Bank NA

Case Details

Full title:CHRISTOPHER JAMAR SUMMERS, Plaintiff, v. WELLS FARGO BANK NA, et al.…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Nov 17, 2011

Citations

No. C 11-04147 WHA (N.D. Cal. Nov. 17, 2011)