From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Summers v. Underwood

United States District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania
Jan 2, 2024
3:23-cv-318-KAP (W.D. Pa. Jan. 2, 2024)

Opinion

3:23-cv-318-KAP

01-02-2024

DARRELL LEE-LAMO SUMMERS, Petitioner v. MICHAEL UNDERWOOD, WARDEN, F.C.I. LORETTO, Respondent


MEMORANDUM ORDER

Keith A. Pesto, United States Magistrate Judge.

Petitioner, an inmate at F.C.I. Loretto, submitted a petition for a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C.§ 2241. Since petitioner is not proceeding in forma pauperis, the Marshal shall make service of the petition (both ECF no. 1 and ECF no. 2) and this Order on the respondents and the United States Attorney for the Western District of Pennsylvania, costs to be advanced by the petitioner.

Within sixty days of service, respondent, through the United States Attorney for the Western District of Pennsylvania, shall file a response to the allegations in the petition for the writ of habeas corpus, showing cause, if any, why the writ should not be granted.


Summaries of

Summers v. Underwood

United States District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania
Jan 2, 2024
3:23-cv-318-KAP (W.D. Pa. Jan. 2, 2024)
Case details for

Summers v. Underwood

Case Details

Full title:DARRELL LEE-LAMO SUMMERS, Petitioner v. MICHAEL UNDERWOOD, WARDEN, F.C.I…

Court:United States District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania

Date published: Jan 2, 2024

Citations

3:23-cv-318-KAP (W.D. Pa. Jan. 2, 2024)