From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Summers v. Trimbal

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Jan 3, 2012
No. 2:11-cv-2584 JFM (HC) (E.D. Cal. Jan. 3, 2012)

Opinion

No. 2:11-cv-2584 JFM (HC)

01-03-2012

GREGORY SUMMERS, Petitioner, v. WARDEN TRIMBAL, Respondent.


ORDER

Petitioner is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis with an application for a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. On December 29, 2011, petitioner filed a motion for a thirty day extension of time to file a traverse. By order filed December 23, 2011, respondent was granted an extension of time until February 7, 2012 to file and serve an answer to the petition. Petitioner's traverse is now due thirty days from that date. Petitioner's motion for extension of time will therefore be denied without prejudice.

In accordance with the above, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that petitioner's traverse is due on or before March 8, 2012. Petitioner's December 29, 2011 motion for extension of time is denied without prejudice.

_________________________________

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

12

summ2584.o


Summaries of

Summers v. Trimbal

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Jan 3, 2012
No. 2:11-cv-2584 JFM (HC) (E.D. Cal. Jan. 3, 2012)
Case details for

Summers v. Trimbal

Case Details

Full title:GREGORY SUMMERS, Petitioner, v. WARDEN TRIMBAL, Respondent.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Jan 3, 2012

Citations

No. 2:11-cv-2584 JFM (HC) (E.D. Cal. Jan. 3, 2012)