finding it was "appropriate to refer to state law in determining the nature of the property interest claimed by a third party in forfeiture proceedings"
Summary of this case from U.S. v. D-1, Nassif Jawad TarrafNo. 90-1129.
April 1, 1991.
C.A. 4th Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 914 F. 2d 556.
finding it was "appropriate to refer to state law in determining the nature of the property interest claimed by a third party in forfeiture proceedings"
Summary of this case from U.S. v. D-1, Nassif Jawad Tarrafrejecting claim that DWI defendants have a constitutional right to jury trial
Summary of this case from State v. KentFull title:SUMITOMO TRUST BANKING CO. (U. S. A.) v. EDEN HANNON CO
Court:U.S.
Date published: Apr 1, 1991
State v. Wade, 169 N.J. 302, 303 (2001); Baumann, supra, 340 N.J. Super. at 556-57, Travers, supra, 229 N.J.…
State v. DenelsbeckIn this appeal, we consider whether a defendant is entitled to a jury trial when facing a third or subsequent…