From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Sultana v. Connelly

Supreme Court, Appellate Term, Second Department
Jun 24, 1959
18 Misc. 2d 459 (N.Y. App. Term 1959)

Opinion

June 24, 1959

Appeal from the City Court of the City of New York, Queens County, MARIO J. CARIELLO, J.

George J. Conway for appellant.

Filardi Feiri for respondent.


It was error to charge as a matter of law that the defendant herein had the duty to inspect the premises. Upon the proof adduced, there was no duty imposed upon the owner to make inspections since there was nothing calculated to arouse her suspicions (see 2A Warren, Negligence, p. 382, § 7).

The judgment should be unanimously reversed upon the law and new trial granted, with costs to defendant to abide the event.

Concur — PETTE, HART and BROWN, JJ.

Judgment reversed, etc.


Summaries of

Sultana v. Connelly

Supreme Court, Appellate Term, Second Department
Jun 24, 1959
18 Misc. 2d 459 (N.Y. App. Term 1959)
Case details for

Sultana v. Connelly

Case Details

Full title:ANTHONY SULTANA, Respondent, v. FRANCES M. CONNELLY, Appellant

Court:Supreme Court, Appellate Term, Second Department

Date published: Jun 24, 1959

Citations

18 Misc. 2d 459 (N.Y. App. Term 1959)
193 N.Y.S.2d 393